天然气技术与经济

贵州煤层气新井压降测试分析

李东, 金军, 汪凌霞, 白丽娜, 周呈艳, 易旺

PDF(1046 KB)
PDF(1046 KB)
天然气技术与经济 ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 35-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1132.2016.03.009
天然气开发

贵州煤层气新井压降测试分析

  • 李东, 金军, 汪凌霞, 白丽娜, 周呈艳, 易旺
作者信息 +

Pressure-drop Testing of A New CBM Well, Guizhou Province

  • LI Dong, JIN Jun, WANG Lingxia, BAI Lina, ZHOU Chengyan, YI Wang
Author information +
History +

摘要

准确获取煤层的渗透率、地层压力以及煤层的破裂压力和闭合压力等储层参数,是为下步增产措施和进一步评价该地区煤层气勘探开发前景提供依据的重要环节。为此分析了某矿区A井(新井)3号煤层注入压降测试和原地应力测试数据,通过双对数曲线、霍纳曲线以及压力拟合求取煤层参数,并用半对数曲线加以验证;在原地应力测试阶段通过时间平方根曲线分析求取储层的破裂压力和闭合压力等地层参数。结果表明:3号煤岩层渗透性较差,属于高压煤层,井筒储集系数较小,采用井下关井方式降低了井筒储集效应对测试数据分析的影响,井筒附近煤层完善程度较好,地应力梯度正常。

Abstract

Getting right parameters of a coal reservoir, including permeability, formation pressure, and breakdown and closure pressure, is important to making stimulation measures and evaluating exploration and development prospect of CBM. No.3 coal bed from A well in a certain mining area was taken as an example. Some data from injection pressure-drop testing and in-situ stress testing were analyzed; and then, obtained by log-log curves, Horner Plot, and pressure matching, some parameters could be confirmed by semi-log curves; finally, such formation parameters as breakdown and closure pressure were acquired by a square-root curve. Results show that this coal bed is characterized by poor permeability, high pressure, and small reservoir coefficient. To adopting a way of downhole shut-in may reduce the reservoir effect on testing data. In addition, this bed is in good condition near wellbore and its stress gradient is also normal.

关键词

煤层气 / 注入压降 / 试井 / 地应力 / 渗透率 / 地层压力

Key words

CBM / injection pressure drop / well test / stress / permeability / formation pressure

引用本文

导出引用
李东 , 金军 , 汪凌霞 , 白丽娜 , 周呈艳 , 易旺. 贵州煤层气新井压降测试分析. 天然气技术与经济. 2016, 10(3): 35-38 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-1132.2016.03.009
LI Dong , JIN Jun , WANG Lingxia , BAI Lina , ZHOU Chengyan , YI Wang. Pressure-drop Testing of A New CBM Well, Guizhou Province. Natural Gas Technology and Economy. 2016, 10(3): 35-38 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-1132.2016.03.009

参考文献

[1] 傅雪海,秦勇,韦重韬. 煤层气地质学[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2007.
[2] 赵福平. 贵州省煤层气试井质量影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2014,6(6):126-129.
[3] 赵培华,刘曰武,鹿倩,等. 煤层气井试井研究的意义[J]. 油气井测试,2010,19(6):1-5.
[4] 陈志胜. 煤层气井常用试井方法及应用[J]. 陕西煤炭,2003(1):40-42.
[5] 刘能强. 实用现代试井解释方法[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
[6] 刘曰武,赵培华,鹿倩,等. 煤层气与常规天然气测试技术的异同[J]. 油气井测试,2010,6(6):6-11.
[7] 陈彦丽,刘启国,张烈辉,等. 浅析煤层气井与常规油气井在试井方面的差别[J]. 中国煤层气,2006,(4):44-46.
[8] 张兆鑫,王德伟,范云霞. 煤层气DST试井方法应用与研究[J]. 环球人文地理,2014(6):64-64.
[9] 张文秀,崔义儒. Slug测试法在煤层气测试中的应用[J]. 煤气与热力,1994(S1):112-115.
[10] 景兴鹏. 不同完井方式下注入/压降煤储层参数法测试结果对比[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2015(2):33-37.
[11] 刘远志,高晓飞,张东平,等. 煤层气井注入/压降测试技术及应用[J]. 油气井测试,2014,(23):30-33.
[12] 柳光伟,安杰. 煤层气注入/压降试井分析中几个问题的探讨[J]. 中国煤层气,2011(1):29-32.
[13] 陈志胜,廉有轩. 煤层气井注入/压降试井测试中有关技术问题探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2003(31):23-26.
[14] 刘立军,王立中,张增惠,等. 煤层气井注入压降试井技术研究[J]. 天然气工业,2004,24(5):79-81.
[15] 李士才,邵先杰,乔雨朋,等. 韩城矿区煤层气井试井分析[J]. 延安大学学报:自然科学版,2015(2):31-35.
[16] 韩永新,庄惠农. 煤层气井注入/压降试井测评分析[J]. 油气井测试,1999(1):51-56.
[17] Ramurthy,M,Marjerisson,D. M, Daves, S.B.Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test in Coals to Determine Pore Pressure and Permeability[J]. SPE 75 701,2002.
[18] Zuber, M.D, Sparks D P,Lee W J. Design and Interpretation of Injection/Falloff Tests for Coalbed Methane Wells[J]. SPE 20 569,1990.
[19] Hopkins,C.W,Frantz J H,Flumerfelt,R.W,et al. Pitfalls of Injection/Falloff Testing in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs[J]. SPE 39 772,1998.
[20] 安杰. 煤储层注入/压降试井中注入段曲线的分析及应用[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2014,(11):31-33.

基金

贵州省科技重大专项“贵州省煤层气地面抽采关键技术研究及工程示范”(黔科合重大专项字[2014]6002号)
PDF(1046 KB)

70

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/